Undergraduates in Cork have to submit them during their course
- Ivan J Perry, Professor of public health. (i.perry@ucc.ie)
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College, Cork.
- Lambeth Southwark and Lewisham Health Authority, London SE1 7NT
- Department of Gerontology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy
- University of Queensland Medical School, Queensland 4006, Australia
EDITOR—Over the past two academic years colleagues and I have used the concept of an evidence based case report, similar to that presented by Glasziou,1 in teaching evidence based medicine in the penultimate year of our undergraduate course in epidemiology and public health.
Students are asked to submit a case report based on the management of a single patient encountered during their clinical work. They are advised to identify one key intervention in the management of the case and to summarise any evidence that supports this intervention. The submission should not exceed 1000 words, of which not more than 300 should describe the clinical details of the case. Students are advised to use no more than five references and to take care to select key papers; they must describe the Medline search strategy that they used.
The case report contributes towards the students' mark in epidemiology and public health at the end of the year. The exercise is designed to help the students relate the theory of evidence based medicine to the reality of everyday clinical practice. Marking the case reports provides good feedback on the effectiveness of our teaching in evidence based medicine. A high proportion of students display evidence of critical reading of the key references. Students tend, however, to focus on the evidence for pharmacological interventions rather than on other forms of treatment or diagnostic strategies. They are reluctant to reflect critically on the management of the case and have difficulty with formulating good questions for evidence based medicine. These observations have prompted a review of methods and …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The word parameter is almost always wrong.
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 25 May 2012
Re: David Morrell
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illnesses
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Are we nearly there with tranexamic acid?
Published 25 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27