This article has a correction
Please see: Patients offered treatment for CHD need full information to make decision
- P McCormack, Associate professor,
- Marc Levine, Associate professor,
- Robert E Rangno, Associate professor
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Departments of Medicine, University of British Columbia
EDITOR—Freemantle et al's editorial on the use of statins started a debate on treatment with cholesterol lowering drugs. 1 2 The subsequent editorial by Muldoon and Criqui,3 and many of the letters on this issue,2 continued to focus on identifying a level of absolute risk reduction at which treatment of patients at risk of coronary heart disease would be advised and, presumably, paid for by a healthcare service provider. In our opinion, most of the discussion failed to separate the issue of rational policy …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012