- Mike Clarke, Imperial Cancer Research Fund research assistanta,
- Liz Greaves, Research assistanta,
- Sam James, Research assistanta
- a Clinical Trial Service Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE
Joel Ray and Marian Vermeulen highlight the existence of misspellings of medical terms in Medline.1 A problem also exists with methodological terms. Perhaps the most important of these for someone interested in patient care or the preparation of a systematic review is the truncated free text “random*,” which might identify reports of randomised trials. We searched Medline for some common misspellings of random to identify how often they occur and whether the retrieved records could have been …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012