Appeal court rules against compulsory caesarean sections

BMJ 1997; 314 doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7086.993 (Published 5 April 1997)
Cite this as: BMJ 1997;314:993.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Clare Dyer, legal correspondent
  1. BMJ

    The courts cannot authorise doctors to perform caesarean sections or other obstetric interventions on mentally competent women against their will, the Court of Appeal in London ruled last week, in a landmark judgment on the rights of pregnant women to refuse treatment.

    The court confirmed that a competent woman has the absolute right to refuse intervention, even if she puts her own or her unborn child's life or health at risk. The court has no jurisdiction to sanction an operation to protect a fetus.

    The ruling will help to allay concerns over the growing number of caesarean sections ordered by the courts in Britain. The High Court in London has sanctioned some half dozen operations in the last year after emergency …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL