Evidence that circumcision is protective is overwhelming
- Edgar J Schoen
- Director Regional Perinatal Screening Program, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, 3900 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94611, USA
EDITOR,—As chairman of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Task Force on Circumcision1 and a reviewer on the topic for the American Cancer Society,2 I am amazed at the claim by Paul M Fleiss and Frederick Hodges that no link exists between circumcision and penile cancer.3 In an incredible example of selective medical amnesia the authors ignore evidence that has accumulated in the past 64 years. They discredit Wolbarst's study in 1932 without mentioning the data.4 Wolbarst reviewed 1103 cases …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012