- J W Wilesmith
- Head of epidemiology department Central Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB
EDITOR,—R W Lacey's letter makes no reference to any scientific paper on the epidemiology of bovine spongiform encephalopathy.1 As a result it contains too many omissions, errors, and misconceptions to pass into the literature unchallenged.
Lacey's description of the cohort study to examine the risk of maternal transmission is incorrect. This study is comparing the incidence of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in offspring of dams that developed clinical signs of the disease and in offspring of dams that reached at least 6 years of age without developing …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012