- David London
- Registrar Royal College of Physicians, London NW1 4LE
Royal College of Physicians gave qualified support to proposals
EDITOR,--Several aspects of Hugh M Mather and Robert S Elkeles's paper giving the attitudes of consultant physicians to the Calman proposals require correction and clarification.1
Firstly, it is wrong to say that the Royal College of Physicians “made no attempt to ascertain the views of those colleagues who are most directly affected.” The president and other officers of the college travelled throughout Britain to discuss the Calman proposals with consultants and trainees both before the report was finalised and after its publication. In addition, the report was regularly on the agenda of meetings open to all fellows, at which they can speak, and of meetings …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012