- J Calder,
- E C Ashby
- Senior house officer in surgery Consultant general surgeon St Richard's Hospital, Chichester PO 19 4SE
Doubt remains over anticoagulant prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis
EDITOR,--Anticoagulant prophylaxis may reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism in hospital, but C J Todd and colleagues' study does not dispel doubts about its overall effect on mortality.1 There was no significant difference between the survival rate at 90 days (82.2% at the four hospitals that routinely gave such prophylaxis (to 79.5% of patients)) and 82.0% at the other four hospitals (prophylaxis given to only 16.1%) despite the fact that 62.3% of patients in the former hospitals had surgery within 24 hours (favourable …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012