This article has a correction
Please see: Correction
- Theresa Marteau,
- Susan Michie
- Director Research fellow Psychology and Genetics Research Group, United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals, Old Medical School Building, Guy's Campus, London SE1 9RT
EDITOR,--The recent ethical debate on the genetic testing of newborn infants for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy among parents, a cardiologist, a paediatrician, and two medical geneticists1 shows the need for research based evidence in this area.
Their views differ in what defines benefit and how this might be achieved. Peter S Harper and Angus Clarke argue that parents' requests to test their children should be met only when there is clear medical benefit to the child. This, however, excludes the benefit of providing psychological relief …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012