Letter

Follow up in breast cancer

BMJ 1995; 311 doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.54 (Published 1 July 1995)
Cite this as: BMJ 1995;311:54.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Eva Grunfeld,
  2. Pat Yudkin,
  3. Ruth Adewuyl-Dalton,
  4. Martin P Vessey,
  5. David Mant
  1. Assistant professor Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8L6
  2. Statistician, ICRF General Practice Research Group Research assistant Professor of public health and primary care Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6HE
  3. Professor of primary care epidemiology Department of Primary Medical Care, University of Southampton, Southampton SO1 6ST

    Quality of life unaffected by general practice follow up

    EDITOR,--John Dewar calls for a reappraisal of how women with breast cancer are followed up.1 We now have compelling evidence that intensive follow up does not improve either quality of life related to health or overall survival.2 3 In the light of this, Dewar wonders what the effect of routine follow up is on the patient, in terms of both quality of life and cost. He also wonders what the optimum follow up practice should be and calls for as rigorous an assessment of follow …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular