Letter

Author's reply

BMJ 1995; 310 doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1602 (Published 17 June 1995)
Cite this as: BMJ 1995;310:1602.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Philip Steer
  1. Professor Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London SW10 9NH

    EDITOR,—To answer the questions of Sarah Vause and colleagues in reverse order, I can reassure them that the data given in our paper referred only to singleton pregnancies. This information was included in our original submission but was inadvertently omitted when we revised the paper to answer points made by referees. I am grateful for the chance to put the record straight. …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular