- A G Dalgleish
- Professor of oncology Division of Oncology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE
EDITOR,—It is easy to sympathise with some of the points on both sides of the argument over whether chemotherapy should be given for solid tumours.1 The nihilistic approach promulgated by G M Mead, however, would lead to no advances in treatment being made. As Mead points out, treatments that might benefit only a small percentage of patients will be sought by most patients—though not by their doctors, as pointed out by Slevin et al.2 The dramatic improvement in …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012