- I C M Paterson
- Consultant clinical oncologist Velindre Hospital, Whitchurch, Cardiff CF4 7XL
EDITOR,—I suspect that the case of an anaesthetist found guilty by the General Medical Council of an assault through lack of consent to his actions will precipitate the full range of emotions among doctors, from concern to outrage.1 The council may, however, have done the profession a favour in the troubled area of consent, which continues to languish in the era since the case of Sidaway v Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital.2 In that case it was sufficient to show that other doctors (even a minority) would not …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012