Criteria for authorship

BMJ 1995; 310 doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6983.869 (Published 1 April 1995)
Cite this as: BMJ 1995;310:869.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Acceptance of a paper should not depend on where the researchers work

  1. J A Sarcristana,
  2. Jesus M Hernandeza
  1. Clinical pharmacologist Director Clinical Reserch Department, Lilly, 28100-Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain

    EDITOR,—We agree with the criteria for authorship set out by the International Committee of Medical Journals Editors but wish to comment on the opposite case—that is, the criteria for exclusion from authorship, a topic that occupies part of the policies of some journals. In principle, these criteria should be the contrary of those mentioned by Goodman and should be related to the lack of scientific contribution of the author.1 This, however, is not always the case. For example, a recent editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine stated …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL