- S J Karp
- Clinical Oncology Centre, North Middlesex Hospital, London N18 1QX.
EDITOR, - M C Gulliford suggests that the Royal College of Radiologists has dismissed the use of population based registries for evaluating treatment of cancer.1 Many registries have incomplete data that have been extracted by clerks from inadequate hospital case notes. In Gulliford et al's study of bladder cancer the rate of discrepancies between cancer registry data and hospital case notes was 17% for the date of first operation, 12% for the date of first radiotherapy and 16% for the radiotherapy dose.2 Only 15% of patients receiving chemotherapy were recorded as such in the registry; 28% of the case notes gave no data on …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012