- C Dyer
The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) in Britain is to be asked this month to approve a paper by its ethics committee strongly opposing the use of the courts to sanction obstetric intervention against a patient's will. The committee takes the same line as the American Medical Association (AMA), which spoke out against the practice after a string of caesarean sections were ordered by courts in the US.
American courts have become more reluctant to make such orders since the District of Columbia Court of Appeals held in 1990 that women have a virtually absolute right to make choices about their health care, even when these endanger the life of …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012